Stats Wrap: Championship Sunday at the Selkirk Red Rock Open

PPA Tour 6 months ago 59 views

MEN’S DOUBLES FINAL:

(2) Dylan Frazier and JW Johnson def. (9) Andre Daescu and Gabe Tardio, 13-11, 11-1, 11-9.

MATCH NOTES:

Seventh career title for Frazier/Johnson.
Daescu/Tardio beat Johns/Johns in semis (their second win over Johns/Johns this year)
Frazier/Johnson beat Daescu/Tardio for Mesa title in February.

RALLIES:

1,388 shots.

126 rallies.

11 shots per rally.

42 rallies per game.

75/126 rallies were 9 shots or less. (60%)

51/126 rallies were 10 shots or more. (40%)

Shortest: 1 shot (7), 2 shots (1), 3 shots (8), 4 shots (7).

(18% of the rallies were four shots or fewer.)

Longest: 44, 36, 33.

(6 rallies were 30 shots or more. 19 were 20+.)

THIRD SHOTS:

Daescu: 22 drops, 14 drives. (61% drops)

Tardio: 13 drops, 2 drives (86% drops)

Daescu/Tardio: 35 drops, 16 drives. (68% drops)

Frazier: 16 drops, 25 drives. (39% drops)

Johnson: 10 drops, 16 drives. (38% drops)

Frazier/Johnson: 26 drops, 41 drives. (38% drops)

Third Shot Totals: 61 drops, 57 drives (51% drops)

***Missed Serves/Returns/Third Shots***

Daescu: (8.) 4 serves long, 1 serve net, 3 third shot drops net.

Tardio: (1) 1 third shot drop net.

Frazier: (4) 2 serves net, 1 third shot drive long, 1 third shot drop net.

Johnson: (3) 1 return net, 2 third shot drops net.

***Third Shots Kept in Play***

Daescu: 33/36 = 91%

Tardio: 14/15 = 93%

Frazier: 39/41 = 95%

Johnson: 34/36 = 94%

SPEED-UPS:

I counted the instances when a regular dinking rally or dinking opportunity was accelerated, and that shot or the ensuing hand-battle led directly to the end of the rally. (therefore, not including speedups that were eventually re-set during the same rally, or when a team became clearly defensive.) Here are those “starts”, and the ensuing result for that -team-.

Daescu: initiated and won 14, initiated and lost 10.

Tardio: initiated and won 2, initiated and lost 4.

Daescu/Tardio: initiated and won 16, initiated and lost 14. (53% success rate)

Frazier: initiated and won 15, initiated and lost 8.

Johnson: initiated and won 11, initiated and lost 2.

Frazier/Johnson: initiated and won 26, initiated and lost 10. (72% success rate)

Speed-up Totals: In the instances I counted, the team that initiated the speed-up won 42 and lost 24, for a 63% success rate.

DINKS INTO THE NET OR WIDE: (Unstressed, “regular” dinks. Not speed-ups, blocks, etc.).

Daescu: 3

Tardio: 0

Frazier: 3

Johnson: 3

RALLIES ENDING IN THREE SHOTS OR LESS (excluding winners): 16

GOOD FUNDAMENTALS: The two categories above accounted for only 20% of the rallies.

CLEAN WINNERS: (No net-cord, no opponent’s paddle).

Daescu: 6

Tardio: 1

Frazier: 5

Johnson: 11.

(18% of the rallies ended with a clean winner)

HIGHLIGHT REEL: (ATPs, Ernes, etc.)

Daescu: none.

Tardio: 1 Erne defended.

Frazier: none.

Johnson: 1 Erne.

OFFENSIVE LOBS: 1.

Tardio: 1.

VOLLEYS INTO THE NET:

Daescu: 11

Tardio: 4

Frazier: 4

Johnson: 5

GAME POINTS:

Daescu/Tardio: Won 0, Lost 2. (Game 1, 11-10)

Frazier/Johnson: Won 3, Lost 3.

TIME OUTS: Did the team that called time out win the next rally? (excluding video reviews)

Daescu/Tardio: Won 3, Lost 0.

Frazier/Johnson: Won 1, Lost 1.

DVR ALERT:

Game One, 6-6-1, Match-high 44-shot rally with several resets.
Game Two, 2-1-1, Great Frazier/Johnson defense.
Game Three, 0-1-1, 23 shots, almost entirely a hands battle.

MIXED DOUBLES FINAL:

(1) Etta Wright and Ben Johns def. (2) Anna Bright and James Ignatowich, 12-14, 11-7, 11-8, 11-1.

MATCH NOTES:

Second title this month for Wright/Johns.
Johns has won at least one gold medal in 19 consecutive tournaments that he has played in, a PPA men’s record.
Wright/Johns lost a game point in Game One, then lost that game, but -won- the match, which is a rare reversal.
In Game One, there were 27 more rallies after the first game point opportunity.

RALLIES:

1,608 shots.

163 rallies.

9.86 shots per rally.

40.7 rallies per game.

93/163 rallies were 9 shots or less. (57%)

70/163 rallies were 10 shots or more. (43%)

Shortest: 1 shot (6), 2 shots (12), 3 shots (13), 4 shots (8).

(23% of the rallies were four shots or fewer.)

Longest: 32, 32, 27.

(2 rallies were 30 shots or more. 14 were 20+.)

THIRD SHOTS:

Wright: 27 drops, 8 drives. (77% drops)

Johns: 34 drops, 15 drives. (69% drops)

Wright/Johns: 61 drops, 23 drives. (72% drops)

Bright: 14 drops, 3 drives. (82% drops)

Ignatowich: 4 drops, 40 drives (9% drops)

Bright/Ignatowich: 18 drops, 43 drives. (29% drops)

Third Shot Totals: 79 drops, 66 drives (54% drops)

***Missed Serves/Returns/Third Shots***

Wright: (7) 3 returns long, 1 return net, 1 return mishit, 1 third shot drive long, 1 third shot drop wide.

Johns: (8.) 2 serves long, 1 serve net, 2 returns net, 1 return long, 1 return mishit, 1 third shot drive net.

Bright: (4) 1 serve long, 1 return wide, 2 third shot drops net.

Ignatowich: (8.) 1 serve net, 1 serve wide, 1 return net, 3 third shot drives net, 1 third shot drive long, 1 third shot drive wide.

***Third Shots Kept in Play***

Wright: 33/35 = 94%

Johns: 48/49 = 97%

Bright: 15/17 – 88%

Ignatowich: 39/44 = 88%

SPEED-UPS:

Wright: initiated and won 0, initiated and lost 0.

Johns: initiated and won 13, initiated and lost 5.

Wright/Johns: initiated and won 13, initiated and lost 5. (72% success rate)

Bright: initiated and won 8, initiated and lost 4.

Ignatowich: initiated and won 12, initiated and lost 12.

Bright/Ignatowich: initiated and won 20, initiated and lost 16. (55% success rate)

Speed-up Totals: In the instances I counted, the team that initiated the speed-up won 33 and lost 21, for a 64% success rate.

DINKS INTO THE NET OR WIDE: (Unstressed, “regular” dinks. Not speed-ups, blocks, etc.).

Wright: 3

Johns: 0

Bright: 3

Ignatowich: 6

RALLIES ENDING IN THREE SHOTS OR LESS (excluding winners): 27

GOOD FUNDAMENTALS: The two categories above accounted for only 23% of the rallies.

CLEAN WINNERS: (No net-cord, no opponent’s paddle).

Wright: 5

Johns: 16

Bright: 7

Ignatowich: 14

(25% of the rallies ended with a clean winner)

HIGHLIGHT REEL: (ATPs, Ernes, etc.)

Wright: 1 ATP, 6 Ernes.

Johns: 2 ATPs, 1 ATP defended, 1 Erne, 1 Erne defended.

Bright: 3 ATPs, 1 ATP defended.

Ignatowich: 3 Ernes, 1 Erne defended.

OFFENSIVE LOBS: 2.

Bright: (2) 2 in and lost rallies.

VOLLEYS INTO THE NET:

Wright: 1

Johns: 10

Bright: 0

Ignatowich: 10

GAME POINTS:

Wright/Johns: Won 3, Lost 3. (Game One, 10-9, lost point and game)

Bright/Ignatowich: Won 1, Lost 4.

TIME OUTS: Did the team that called time out win the next rally? (excluding video reviews)

Wright/Johns: none

Bright/Ignatowich: Won 5, Lost 2.

DVR ALERT:

Game One, 10-10-1: Bright ATP.
Game Three, 5-4-1: scrambling rally, Johns ATP.
Game Three, 10-8-1: Johns Erne defended winner off his hand.

WOMEN’S DOUBLES FINAL:

(4) Lea Jansen and Tina Pisnik def. (1) Anna Bright and Callie Smith, 11-1, 11-7, 11-7.

MATCH NOTES:

First PPA gold medal for Pisnik.
Second podium finish for Jansen/Pisnik this year.
14.54 shots per rally is the most in -any- doubles final this year. 25% of the rallies lasted 20 shots or more.

RALLIES:

1,775 shots.

122 rallies.

14.54 shots per rally.

40.6 rallies per game.

49/122 rallies were 9 shots or less. (40%)

73/122 rallies were 10 shots or more. (60%)

Shortest: 1 shot (0), 2 shots (1), 3 shots (8), 4 shots (7).

(13% of the rallies were four shots or fewer.)

Longest: 53, 45, 44.

(9 rallies were 30 shots or more. 31 were 20+.)

THIRD SHOTS:

Bright: 4 drops, 4 drives. (50% drops)

Smith: 28 drops, 17 drives. (62% drops)

Bright/Smith: 32 drops, 21 drives. (60% drops)

Jansen: 1 drop, 17 drives. (5% drops)

Pisnik: 40 drops, 10 drives (80% drops)

Jansen/Pisnik: 41 drops, 27 drives. (60% drops)

Third Shot Totals: 73 drops, 48 drives (60% drops)

***Missed Serves/Returns/Third Shots***

Bright: (1) 1 third shot drive net.

Smith: (3) 1 return long, 1 third shot drop net, 1 third shot drive wide.

Jansen: (1) 1 third shot drive net.

Pisnik: (3) 2 third shot drops net, 1 third shot drive net.

***Third Shots Kept in Play***

Bright: 7/8 = 87%

Smith: 43/45 = 95%

Jansen: 17/18 = 94%

Pisnik: 47/50 = 94%

SPEED-UPS:

Bright: initiated and won 12, initiated and lost 7.

Smith: initiated and won 3, initiated and lost 15.

Bright/Smith: initiated and won 15, initiated and lost 22. (40% success rate)

Jansen: initiated and won 7, initiated and lost 2.

Pisnik: initiated and won 7, initiated and lost 2.

Jansen/Pisnik: initiated and won 14, initiated and lost 4. (77% success rate)

Speed-up Totals: In the instances I counted, the team that initiated the speed-up won 29 and lost 26, for a 52% success rate.

DINKS INTO THE NET OR WIDE: (Unstressed, “regular” dinks. Not speed-ups, blocks, etc.).

Bright: 4

Smith: 5

Jansen: 5

Pisnik: 5

RALLIES ENDING IN THREE SHOTS OR LESS (excluding winners): 8

GOOD FUNDAMENTALS: The two categories above accounted for only 14% of the rallies.

CLEAN WINNERS: (No net-cord, no opponent’s paddle).

Bright: 3

Smith: 4

Jansen: 11

Pisnik: 7

(20% of the rallies ended with a clean winner)

HIGHLIGHT REEL: (ATPs, Ernes, etc.)

none.

OFFENSIVE LOBS: 7.

Bright: (7) 6 in and won rallies, 1 in and lost rally.

VOLLEYS INTO THE NET:

Bright: 1

Smith: 10

Jansen: 5

Pisnik: 8

GAME POINTS:

Bright/Smith: none.

Jansen/Pisnik: Won 3, Lost 8. (lost 6 in Game Three before winning game and match)

TIME OUTS: Did the team that called time out win the next rally? (excluding video reviews)

Bright/Smith: Won 1, Lost 4.

Jansen/Pisnik: none.

DVR ALERT:

Game One, 10-0-2: Match-high 53-shot rally.
Game Three, 3-4-1: Great Jansen defense, then a winner in a small window.
Game Three, 4-3-2: 43-shot rally.

MEN’S SINGLES FINAL:

(1) Federico Staksrud def. (11) Jack Sock, 11-3, 2-11, 11-7.

MATCH NOTES:

Ninth straight final for Staksrud (four golds, five silvers).
Staksrud’s first tournament as the overall top-ranked player.
Sock’s first PPA singles final. .

CLEAN WINNERS: (No net-cord, no opponent’s paddle).

Staksrud: 9, including 2 on the third shot.

Sock: 16, including 9 on the third shot.

ERRORS on SERVES and RETURNS:

Staksrud: (10). 3 on serves, 7 on returns.

Sock: (11). 3 on serves, 8 on returns.

BASELINE DRIVE ERRORS:

Staksrud: 7, including 6 on the third shot.

Sock: 15, including 9 on the third shot.

WINNERS/ERRORS PLUS/MINUS (from above):

Staksrud: -8

Sock: -10

LONGEST RALLY: 12 shots. (Game One: 9-3; Game Three: 8-7)

GAME POINTS:

Staksrud: Won 2, Lost 3.

Sock: Won 1, Lost 0.

TIME OUTS: Did the player that called time out win the next rally? (excluding video reviews)

Staksrud: Won 1, Lost 0.

Sock: Won 0, Lost 1.

DVR ALERT:

Game One, 6-1, Staksrud return, then drop volley.
Game One, 10-3: Sock Erne.
Game Two, 9-2: Sock inside-out forehand winner.
Game Two, 10-2: Sock hustle-winner on game point.

WOMEN’S SINGLES FINAL:

(1) Mary Brascia def. (2) Lea Jansen, 7-11, 11-4, 11-9.

MATCH NOTES:

First PPA gold medal for Mary Brascia.
Brascia won two silvers earlier this year (both losses to A.L. Waters)
Jansen won the Houston title two weeks ago.
Match included an 18-minute medical delay for Jansen.

CLEAN WINNERS: (No net-cord, no opponent’s paddle).

Brascia: 20, including 3 on the third shot.

Jansen: 24, including 5 on the third shot.

ERRORS on SERVES and RETURNS:

Brascia: (9). 4 on serves, 5 on returns.

Jansen: (5). 1 on serves, 4 on returns.

BASELINE DRIVE ERRORS:

Brascia: 6, including 1 on the third shot.

Jansen: 8, including 5 on the third shot.

WINNERS/ERRORS PLUS/MINUS (from above):

Brascia: +5

Jansen: +11

LONGEST RALLY: 12 shots. (Game Three, 8-9: a wild scrambling rally)

GAME POINTS:

Brascia: Won 2, Lost 3.

Jansen: Won 1, Lost 0.

TIME OUTS: Did the player that called time out win the next rally? (excluding video reviews)

Brascia: Won 3, Lost 1.

Jansen: Won 1, Lost 2.

DVR ALERT:

Game Two, 2-3: Back-to-back third shot winners by Brascia.
Game Two, 10-4: Jansen return winner.
Game Three, 7-8: Brascia running backhand winner.

Source: PPA Tour

Anuncie Aqui / Advertise Here

Sua marca para o mundo Pickleball! / Your brand for the Pickleball world!

Read the Original Content on PPA Tour

Disclaimer: Pickleball Unit is a Decentralized News Aggregator that enables journalists, influencers, editors, publishers, websites and community members to share news about Pickleball. User must always do their own research and none of those articles are financial advices. The content is for informational purposes only and does not necessarily reflect our opinion.