Stats Wrap: CIBC Texas Open Championship Sunday.

PPA Tour 5 months ago 64 views

Rockwall, Texas. June 2, 2024.

MIXED DOUBLES FINAL:

(1) Anna Leigh Waters and Ben Johns def. (4) Jorja Johnson and JW Johnson, 11-2, 11-7, 11-9.

MATCH NOTES:

Waters/Johns: sixth title together this year, and 33^rd career title together.
Johnsons have now lost four consecutive finals against Waters/Johns.
Fox broadcast.

RALLIES:

1,230 shots.

121 rallies.

10.1 shots per rally.

40.3 rallies per game.

74/121 rallies were 9 shots or less. (61%)

47/121 rallies were 10 shots or more. (39%)

Shortest: 1 shot (1), 2 shots (5), 3 shots (4), 4 shots (11).

(17% of the rallies were four shots or fewer.)

Longest: 62, 39, 34, 32.

(4 rallies were 30 shots or more. 9 were 20+.)

THIRD SHOTS:

Waters: 15 drops, 12 drives. (55% drops)

Johns: 17 drops, 20 drives. (45% drops)

Waters/Johns: 32 drops, 32 drives. (50% drops)

Jorja Johnson: 8 drops, 2 drives. (80% drops)

JW Johnson: 22 drops (includes 1 lob), 19 drives (53% drops)

Johnson/Johnson: 30 drops, 21 drives. (58% drops)

Third Shot Totals: 62 drops, 53 drives (53% drops)

***Missed Serves/Returns/Third Shots***

Waters: (1) 1 return wide.

Johns: (5) 1 return mishit, 1 return long, 1 return net, 3 third shot drives net.

Jorja Johnson: (1) 1 return long.

JW Johnson: (3) 1 serve long, 1 third shot drop net, 1 third shot drive net.

***Third Shots Kept in Play***

Waters: 27/27 = 100%

Johns: 35/37 = 94%

Jorja Johnson: 10/10 = 100%

JW Johnson: 39/41 = 95%

SPEED-UPS:

I counted the instances when a regular dinking rally or dinking opportunity was accelerated, and that shot or the ensuing hand-battle led directly to the end of the rally. (therefore, not including speedups that were eventually re-set during the same rally, or when a team became clearly defensive.) Here are those “starts”, and the ensuing result for that -team-.

Waters: initiated and won 1, initiated and lost 2.

Johns: initiated and won 8, initiated and lost 3.

Waters/Johns: initiated and won 9, initiated and lost 5. (64% success rate)

Johnson: initiated and won 12, initiated and lost 8.

Johnson: initiated and won 0, initiated and lost 3.

Johnson/Johnson: initiated and won 12, initiated and lost 11. (52% success rate)

Speed-up Totals: In the instances I counted, the team that initiated the speed-up won 21 and lost 16, for a 56% success rate.

DINKS INTO THE NET OR WIDE: (Unstressed, “regular” dinks. Not speed-ups, blocks, etc.).

Waters: 2

Johns: 2

Jorja Johnson: 7

JW Johnson: 0

RALLIES ENDING IN THREE SHOTS OR LESS (excluding winners): 10

GOOD FUNDAMENTALS: The two categories above accounted for only 8% of the rallies.

CLEAN WINNERS: (No net-cord, no opponent’s paddle).

Waters: 0

Johns: 12

Jorja Johnson: 2

JW Johnson: 7

(17% of the rallies ended with a clean winner)

HIGHLIGHT REEL: (ATPs, Ernes, etc.)

Waters: 1 ATP.

Johns: 2 ATPs.

Jorja Johnson: 1 Erne.

JW Johnson: 1 ATP defended.

OFFENSIVE LOBS: 7.

Waters: 0

Johns: 0

Jorja Johnson: (4) 2 in and won rallies, 2 in and lost rallies.

JW Johnson: (3) 1 in and won rally, 2 in and lost rallies.

VOLLEYS INTO THE NET:

Waters: 5

Johns: 10

Jorja Johnson: 12

JW Johnson: 8

GAME POINTS:

Waters/Johns: Won 3, Lost 9 (six of those in Game Three).

Johnson/Johnson: Won 0, Lost 0.

TIME OUTS: Did the team that called time out win the next rally? (excluding video reviews)

Waters/Johns: Won 2, Lost 1.

Johnson/Johnson: Won 2, Lost 1.

DVR ALERT:

Game Two, 3-2-1: 39-shot rally.
Game Two, 3-6-2: Johns flying forehand winner.
Game Three, 9-4-2: Ben “reaction” winner.
Game Three, 10-7-2: Match-high 62-shot rally.

MEN’S DOUBLES FINAL:

(2) Dylan Frazier and JW Johnson def. (4) Dekel Bar and Matt Wright, 9-11, 11-3, 11-5, 11-4.

MATCH NOTES:

Ninth career win for Frazier/Johnson together: second-best among men.
Thirds straight tournament won by Frazier/Johnson.
Bar/Wright defeated Johns brothers in the semis. (Third straight semis loss for Johns brothers)
Fox coverage started at Game Three, 8-3.

RALLIES:

1,781 shots.

158 rallies.

11.3 shots per rally.

39.25 rallies per game.

82/158 rallies were 9 shots or less. (52%)

75/158 rallies were 10 shots or more. (48%)

Shortest: 1 shot (2), 2 shots (3), 3 shots (19), 4 shots (3).

(17% of the rallies were four shots or fewer.)

Longest: 47, 40, 37.

(7 rallies were 30 shots or more. 21 were 20+.)

THIRD SHOTS:

Frazier: 11 drops, 8 drives. (57% drops)

Johnson: 35 drops, 32 drives. (52% drops)

Frazier/Johnson: 46 drops, 40 drives. (53% drops)

Bar: 16 drops, 33 drives. (32% drops)

Wright: 8 drops, 10 drives (44% drops)

Bar/Wright: 24 drops, 43 drives. (35% drops)

Third Shot Totals: 70 drops, 83 drives (45% drops)

***Missed Serves/Returns/Third Shots***

Frazier: (4) 1 serve long, 1 return net, 2 third shot drops net.

Johnson: (3) 2 third shot drops net, 1 third shot drive net.

Bar: (7) 1 serve long, 4 third shot drops net, 1 third shot drive net, 1 third shot drive long.

Wright: (3) 1 return wide, 1 third shot drive long, 1 third shot drop net.

***Third Shots Kept in Play***

Frazier: 17/19 = 89%

Johnson: 64/67 = 95%

Bar: 43/49 = 87%

Wright: 16/18 = 88%

SPEED-UPS:

Frazier: initiated and won 11, initiated and lost 8.

Johnson: initiated and won 7, initiated and lost 5.

Frazier/Johnson: initiated and won 18, initiated and lost 13. (58% success rate)

Bar: initiated and won 15, initiated and lost 14.

Wright: initiated and won 6, initiated and lost 2.

Bar/Wright: initiated and won 21, initiated and lost 16. (56% success rate)

Speed-up Totals: In the instances I counted, the team that initiated the speed-up won 39 and lost 29, for a 57% success rate.

DINKS INTO THE NET OR WIDE: (Unstressed, “regular” dinks. Not speed-ups, blocks, etc.).

Frazier: 2

Johnson: 2

Bar: 3

Wright: 1

RALLIES ENDING IN THREE SHOTS OR LESS (excluding winners): 17.

GOOD FUNDAMENTALS: The two categories above accounted for only 15% of the rallies.

CLEAN WINNERS: (No net-cord, no opponent’s paddle).

Frazier: 9

Johnson: 11

Bar: 8

Wright: 3

(19% of the rallies ended with a clean winner)

HIGHLIGHT REEL: (ATPs, Ernes, etc.)

Frazier: 2 Ernes defended.

Johnson: 1 ATP, 1 Erne defended.

Bar: 3 Ernes.

Wright: 1 ATP defended.

OFFENSIVE LOBS: 11.

Frazier: (2) 2 in and won rallies.

Johnson: (3) 2 in and won rallies, 1 out.

Bar: (1) 1 in and won rally.

Wright: (5) 2 in and won rallies, 1 in and lost rally, 2 out.

VOLLEYS INTO THE NET:

Frazier: 7

Johnson: 10

Bar: 12

Wright: 9

GAME POINTS:

Frazier/Johnson: Won 3, Lost 2.

Bar/Wright: Won 1, Lost 0.

TIME OUTS: Did the team that called time out win the next rally? (excluding video reviews)

Frazier/Johnson: none.

Bar/Wright: Won 1, Lost 6.

DVR ALERT:

Game One, 8-8-1: Match-high 47-shot rally.
Game Three, 0-1-2: nice sequence: Johnson ATP, Wright ATP defended, Johnson winner.
Game Four: 8-3-2: Wright lob, Frazier mishit winner.

WOMEN’S DOUBLES FINAL:

(1) Catherine Parenteau and Anna Leigh Waters def. (3) Lucy Kovalova and Callie Smith, 11-3, 11-3, 11-4.

MATCH NOTES:

Parenteau/Waters’ sixth title this year, and 17^th together.
Kovalova/Smith’s second final this year. They have 8 career titles together.
Fox broadcast.

RALLIES:

998 shots.

104 rallies.

9.6 shots per rally.

34.7 rallies per game.

50/104 rallies were 9 shots or less. (48%)

54/104 rallies were 10 shots or more. (52%)

Shortest: 1 shot (0), 2 shots (1), 3 shots (7), 4 shots (6).

(13% of the rallies were four shots or fewer.)

Longest: 27, 26, 25, 24.

(No rallies were 30 shots or more. Ten were 20+.)

THIRD SHOTS:

Parenteau: 24 drops, 9 drives. (72% drops)

Waters: 22 drops, 7 drives. (75% drops)

Parenteau/Waters: 46 drops, 16 drives. (74% drops)

Kovalova: 1 drop, 6 drives. (14% drops)

Smith: 27 drops, 7 drives (79% drops)

Kovalova/Smith: 28 drops, 13 drives. (68% drops)

Third Shot Totals: 74 drops, 29 drives (71% drops)

***Missed Serves/Returns/Third Shots***

Parenteau: (2). 2 third shot drives net.

Waters: none.

Kovalova: (2). 1 return long, 1 third shot drive net.

Smith: (4) 4 third shot drops net.

***Third Shots Kept in Play***

Parenteau: 31/33 = 93%

Waters: 29/29 = 100%

Kovalova: 6/7 = 85%

Smith: 30/34 = 88%

SPEED-UPS:

Parenteau: initiated and won 8, initiated and lost 4.

Waters: initiated and won 13, initiated and lost 5.

Parenteau/Waters: initiated and won 21, initiated and lost 9. (70% success rate)

Kovalova: initiated and won 0, initiated and lost 3.

Smth: initiated and won 4, initiated and lost 3.

Kovalova/Smith: initiated and won 4, initiated and lost 6. (40% success rate)

Speed-up Totals: In the instances I counted, the team that initiated the speed-up won 25 and lost 15, for a 62% success rate.

DINKS INTO THE NET OR WIDE: (Unstressed, “regular” dinks. Not speed-ups, blocks, etc.).

Parenteau: 0

Waters: 2

Kovalova: 0

Smith: 3

RALLIES ENDING IN THREE SHOTS OR LESS (excluding winners): 8

GOOD FUNDAMENTALS: The two categories above accounted for only 12% of the rallies.

CLEAN WINNERS: (No net-cord, no opponent’s paddle).

Parenteau: 6

Waters: 13

Kovalova: 5

Smith: 7

(29% of the rallies ended with a clean winner)

HIGHLIGHT REEL: (ATPs, Ernes, etc.)

Parenteau: none.

Waters: 1 Tweener.

Kovalova: none.

Smith: 1 Erne.

OFFENSIVE LOBS: 22.

Parenteau: (4) 2 in and won rallies, 1 in and lost rally, 1 out.

Waters: (1) 1 in and won rally.

Kovalova: (8.) 3 in and won rallies, 5 in and lost rallies.

Smith: none.

VOLLEYS INTO THE NET:

Parenteau: 2

Waters: 9

Kovalova: 4

Smith: 7

GAME POINTS:

Parenteau/Waters: Won 3, Lost 2.

Kovalova/Smith: Won 0, Lost 0.

TIME OUTS: Did the team that called time out win the next rally? (excluding video reviews)

Parenteau/Waters: none.

Kovalova/Smith: Won 1, Lost 2.

DVR ALERT:

Game One, 3-3-1: Parenteau defense, Waters winner.
Game Two, 1-1-1: Two lobs, Waters ‘tweener, Kovalova winner.
Game Three, 1-2-1: Match-high 27-shot rally.
Game Three, 7-4-2: Kovalova fourth-shot dink winner down the middle.

MEN’S SINGLES FINAL:

(1) Ben Johns def. (22) Chris Haworth, 2-11, 11-3, 11-9.

MATCH NOTES:

First PPA medal (and Final) for Haworth.
Johns now has 21 straight tournaments played earning at least one gold medal.
Johns: Fifth singles title this year, and 38^th career.

CLEAN WINNERS: (No net-cord, no opponent’s paddle).

Johns: 10, including 2 on the third shot.

Haworth: 15, including 7 on the third shot.

ERRORS on SERVES and RETURNS:

Johns: (7). 2 on serves, 5 on returns.

Haworth: (12). 4 on serves, 8 on returns.

BASELINE DRIVE ERRORS:

Johns: 2, including 2 on the third shot.

Haworth: 9, including 4 on the third shot.

WINNERS/ERRORS PLUS/MINUS (from above):

Johns: +1

Haworth: -6

LONGEST RALLY: 13 shots.

GAME POINTS:

Johns: Won 2, Lost 1.

Haworth: Won 1, Lost 1.

TIME OUTS: Did the player that called time out win the next rally? (excluding video reviews)

Johns: Won 2, Lost 0.

Haworth: Won 0, Lost 2.

DVR ALERT:

Game Two, 0-0: Match-high13-shot rally.
Game Two, 7-3: Johns ATP.
Game Two, 8-3: Johns nice winner.
Game Three, 3-2: Match-high 13-shot rally, scrambling.
Game Three, 9-5: Johns backhand cross-court dink winner.

WOMEN’S SINGLES FINAL:

(3) Lea Jansen def. (4) Salome Devidze, 9-11, 11-7, 11-2.

MATCH NOTES:

Fourth career singles title for Jansen, and second this year.
First final between Jansen and Devidze.

CLEAN WINNERS: (No net-cord, no opponent’s paddle).

Devidze: 11, including 0 on the third shot.

Jansen: 18, including 1 on the third shot.

ERRORS on SERVES and RETURNS:

Devidze: (7). 2 on serves, 5 on returns.

Jansen: (11). 6 on serves, 5 on returns.

BASELINE DRIVE ERRORS:

Devidze: 19, including 6 on the third shot.

Jansen: 21, including 11 on the third shot.

WINNERS/ERRORS PLUS/MINUS (from above):

Devidze: -15

Jansen: -14

LONGEST RALLY: 14 shots.

GAME POINTS:

Devidze: Won 1, Lost 2.

Jansen: Won 1, Lost 1.

TIME OUTS: Did the player that called time out win the next rally? (excluding video reviews)

Devidze: Won 1, Lost 2.

Jansen: Won 2, Lost 1.

DVR ALERT:

Game Two, 1-0: Match-high 14-shot rally.
Game Two, 8-7: Match-high 14-shot rally.
Game Three, 0-2: Jansen amazing court coverage.

Source: PPA Tour

Anuncie Aqui / Advertise Here

Sua marca para o mundo Pickleball! / Your brand for the Pickleball world!

Read the Original Content on PPA Tour

Disclaimer: Pickleball Unit is a Decentralized News Aggregator that enables journalists, influencers, editors, publishers, websites and community members to share news about Pickleball. User must always do their own research and none of those articles are financial advices. The content is for informational purposes only and does not necessarily reflect our opinion.